Study Group for Roman Pottery (SGRP)   SGRP Homepage                           
Journal of Roman Pottery Studies    Volume 3, 1990  Edited by Rob Perrin

                     
Roman Pottery Bibliography - Page 121

      Edited by  R. P. Symonds, with indexes by J R. Perrin  (see bottom)

645 Liou, B & Pomey, P. ‘Direction des recherches archéologiques sous-marines’, Gallia 43, fasc. 2, 1985, 547-576.
exc/mar/(underwater)/shipwrecks/lst BC-early 1st AD/usf 
amp (various early types)/arr
A lengthy collection of reports on shipwreck archaeology in the western Mediterranean. There is a single example of a Dressel form 26 which is definitely AD; but for those interested in Dressel 1 forms, Pascual 1 and greco-italian forms, a considerable number of vessels are illustrated, with inscriptions and/or stamps in many cases, with much discussion, and the shipwrecks themselves are illustrated with both plans and photographs.

646 López Muller, A, ‘Producción e importación de cerámicas de paredes finas en Cataluña’, Société Française d' Etude de la Céramique Antique en Gaule, Actes du Congrès de Toulouse, 9-11 mai 1986, 1986, 57-72.
exc,col,syn/trd,ptp/Augustan-Claudian/typ
pff (Spanish)
A detailed paper on fine wares found in Catalonia, i.e. the eastern side of Spain. There is substantial and important local production, but of principle interest to more distant readers will be the two figures, comprising some 38 vessels, of early colour-coated wares imported (mostly) from Baetica: these show the full range of Spanish pre-Flavian colour-coated wares, of which we find small quantities in Britain.

647 Lutz; M, ‘Satuminus et Satto en Grande-Bretagne’, Rei Cretariae Romanae Fautores, Acta XXV/XXVI, 1987, 311-324.
exc,col,syn/trd/120-160
ets/eqp
A detailed paper on products of the Saturninus-Satto group of porters found in Britain. A total of 35 examples are discussed, although the illustrations are limited to a presentation of the typical poinçons used by these porters. The important objective of the discussion is to point out that Saturninus and Satto were not simultaneously running a series of workshops in the region of Lorraine and nearby Rheinland-Pfalz, they were separate potters whose floruits and whose decorative styles were not entirely overlapping. Although some sherds/vessels may only be attributable to ‘the Saturninus-Satto group’, which may include other imitators as well, a considerable majority of pieces (32 out of 35, in this case) may be clearly attributed to either Saturninus or Satto in particular.

648 Mayet., F, ‘Les figlinae dans les marques d’amphores Dressel 20 de Bétique’, Revue des Etudes Anciennes LXXXVIII, 1986, 285-305.
syn/---/lst BC-3rd AD
amp/stv
"English Abstract.- Does the word figlinae - which appears on the stamps and the tituli picti of the oil amphorae from Baetica (Dressel 20) - correspond to the one which can be found in literary documents and on brick stamps? If the figlinae which appears on the amphorae about the middle of the second century do reveal the existence of units of production, which are their relationships with the fundi, and what do the so frequent earlier tria nomina represent?" A detailed paper on the meaning of amphora stamps (none illustrated).

649 McCann, A M, ‘The Portus Cosanus: A Centre of Trade in the Late Republic’, Rei Cretariae Romanae Fautores, Acta
XXV/XXVI, 1987, 21-70.
exc,col,syn/ptp,trd/lst BC/usf
amp/stv/arr

The amphoras and Italian samian presented in this paper are all somewhat earlier than the normal scope of this Bibliography, but the paper is undoubtedly worthy of inclusion all the same, as it is a masterful case-study of Roman economic life. The Portus Cosanus was a port on the coast of ancient Etruria, which had a man-made fish-farming lagoon, and which was a production centre for amphorae used to export both garum and wine (this is the earliest commercial exploitation of garum known to the author, and the fishery was of substantial size - "the famous fisheries of ancient Baetica on the southern coast of Spain are all much smaller and do not date before Augustan times"). A large proportion of the amphorae (Dressel 1, Type 4) are bear the stamps of a family known as the Sestii, and they include a number of trademarks, including a lighthouse symbol, thought to be a direct reference to a lighthouse which stood at the mouth of the port. The paper represents a thorough investigation of the many sides to this story, and it is a ‘good read’! (Its presentation at Oxford in 1984 was one of the highlights of that Fautores meeting).

650 Moser, F & Tilhard, J-L, ‘Un nouveau centre de production de céramique sigillée: Brive (Corrèze)’, Société Française d’Etude de la Céramique Antique en Gaule, Actes du Congrès de Toulouse, 9-11 mai 1986, 1986, 93-104.
exc,syn/ptp/c80-c110/usf
sts (Brive)
Following the presentation of this paper at the 1986 meeting of the SFECAG at Toulouse, the discussion (published in a section following the paper) was opened by Main Vernhet, excavator at La Graufesenque, who said, "We have just witnessed the birth of a new child: the workshop at Brive. As with a child, one looks to see whom it resembles..." This paper concentrates on some mould-decorated figure-types, some mould-decorated bowls, and some Drag form 35/36 bowls. A much fuller report has since been published: see entry no. 651.

651 Moser, F & Tilhard, J-L, ‘Un nouvel atelier de sigillée en Aquitaine’, Revue Aquitania Tome V. 1987, 35-121.
exc,col,syn/ptp/c80-c110/typ
sts (Brive)/eqp
See also entry no. 650. The discovery of a new samian production centre, confirmed by excavations in 1986 and by analyses of the fabrics of the vessels found, must count as a momentous event in Roman pottery studies. This is an extremely detailed publication of the results of several years’ study of the evidence, which only became conclusive relatively recently, although Brive can now become the legitimate source of a considerable number of vessels
elsewhere identified as "?La Graufesenque, unusual style". The report includes a large number of figure-types, motifs, and examples of moulds and mould-decorated sherds and vessels, as well as the results of a wide range of technical analyses, and general conclusions. It is fortunate that such an important occurrence has been published so quickly, and so competently.

652 Moulin, J, ‘Liberchies. Bons-Villers: lot de vingt-cinq petits vases gallo-romaines en céramique commune’, Documents d’Arch. Régionale, 1, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1986, 20- 25.
exc/unk/lst-4th/usf
buf (‘unguentaria’)

    Page 120            page 121            page 122

Return to Vol 3  pages 92-130 listing

The Group would welcome comments upon its WebPages and any information that may be useful to Group members 
and those interested in aspects of pottery of the Roman period. Please send details to webmaster@sgrp.org