|
Study Group for Roman Pottery
(SGRP) SGRP
Homepage |
||
|
Rhineland. Its products, which Drag form 17 and Ritterling
form 5 seem to include only one (circular) stamp, P. Flos, but
examples have been found at Neuss, Cologne, Andernach, Mainz and Weisbaden.
Chemical analysis is also used to show that this was indeed a local
production, not merely a variant of Italian type. |
the parts of some scholars to
suggest that trade was not profit-oriented, that it was rarely a source of
great wealth, that the status of traders was generally low, that ancient
towns were centres of consumption, not of production, that markets were not
interdependent (C R. Garnsey P, Hopkins, K & Whittaker, C R, eds, Trade
in the Ancient Economy, University of Calif. Press, 1983). Undoubtedly
there is an element of truth in such generalizations, but on the whole the
Roman shipping amphoras indicate that the Roman economy was instead governed
by the response of manufacturers and shippers to the demands of an extensive
network of interdependent markets. A pattern of energetic competition
emerges as the dominant economic characteristic, especially during the last
two centuries of the Republic and the early imperial period". |
|
Return to Vol 3 pages 92-130 listing
The Group would welcome comments
upon its WebPages and any information that may be useful to Group members
and those interested in aspects of pottery of the Roman period. Please send
details to webmaster@sgrp.org