|
36 Indre
:
Journal of Roman Pottery
Studies
Vol 5, 1992 page 143
*1176 Allain, J, Fauduet, I and
Tuffreau-Libre, M, La nécropole gallo-romaine du "champ de
l 'Image " à Argentomagus (Saint-Marcel, Indre), Rev
Archéol Centre Suppl 3 1992. See entry nos 1177-9 for pottery
details.
exc/cem/early 1st-early 3rd/usf
The authors were not able to determine accurately the cemetery's
lifespan, partly due to the lack of comparable dated pottery
from the region (Centre) and partly due to problems (e.g. the
loss of some finds) caused by the gap between excavation (in the
1960s and 1970s) and publication. A small excavation on another
cemetery-site is reported at the end of the volume (219-228).
*1177
Fauduet, I and Rouvier-Jeanlin, M, 'Les figurines en terre cuite',
in entry no. 1176, 170-183.
obj
Fauduet and Rouvier-Jeanlin provide catalogues and a discussion
of the material (mainly Venus figurines and largely from
infant-burials and a deposit of cremation debris).
*1178
Pinon, P, 'La céramique sigillée', in entry no. 1176, 143-144.
?arr,cts,sts
A catalogue (eighteen cremations, seven inhumations, general
site layers and stamps) and a brief discussion of samian as
grave-goods.
*1179
Tuffreau-Libre, M, 'La céramique commune', in entry no. 1176,
132-142.
occ/hpb/mca/buf/osd/wht/wcs/rsw/blk/gry
The 100+ cremations and 10+ inhumations with pottery, and 18+
groups of unaccompanied vessels, are catalogued earlier in the
report (31-110). The discussion section (122-127) considers
patterns among the pottery grave-goods (e.g. the diminishing
numbers of vessels accompanying cremations, first to third
centuries, form-choices and associations). Tuffreau-Libre is
only able to propose an overall date-range (mid C2-early C3) for
the pottery, rather than a chronological sequence of burial
groups (as in entry no. 1244, below). Her contribution here is
largely devoted to discussing the vessel-forms found (dishes,
bowls, tripod bowls, jars, miniature jars, beakers, flagons
etc.), drawing on regional comparisons and those from further
afield. She also considers the significance of the first-century
pottery present. The cremations were generally
sparsely-furnished (most had only two pottery vessels, chosen
from a restricted repertoire, generally a jar/ beaker and a
lid/dish). There were very few fine ware vessels. This whole
report and the one on Baralle (see entry no. 1244) provide a
wealth of ideas and comparative material for those reporting on
the pottery from Romano-British cremation cemeteries.
|
|
|