|
Argonne:
Journal
of Roman Pottery Studies
Vol 3, 1990 page 114.
597 Blaszkiewicz, P, David, P. Jigan,
C & Marin, J-Y, ‘Quelques données nouvelles sur la nécropole
gab-romaine du Grand- Jardin à Lisieux (Calvados): La
collection Delaporte du Musée de Lille’, Revue Arch. Ouest
3, 1986, 119-134.
col/cem/lst-3rd/usf
cts/rgh/blg/lox/wht
A short paper publishing pottery and glass from a 19th century
collection, with the aim of putting the material into a modern
perspective on Roman pottery found in Lower Normandy. It is not
a large amount of material, however, and it will probably be
more important for its coarse wares than for the imports: had it
been written only a year or so later, its writers would have
been unlikely to have attributed the roughcast, cornice-rimmed
beakers to Compiègne, as their own more recent research has
shown evidence both of local production and of importation
otherwise almost exclusively from the Argonne.
Location: Muséc des Beaux-Arts, Lille
598
Blaszkiewicz, P & Dufoumier, D, ‘Caractérisation et
diffusion du "gobelet sac" en Normandie, du milieu du
ler a la fin du Iie siècle’, Sociéty Française d Elude
de la Céramique Antique en Gaule, Actes du Congrès de Caen, 28-31
mai, 1987, 1987, 75-80.
exc,col,syn/trd/mid 1st-end of 2nd/typ
ccc/hpb/rhn/rgh/occ/
A useful summary of the types of colour-coated beakers found in
Normandy dating from the latter half of the 1st century to the
end of the 2nd (or perhaps somewhat later, to judge by the
inclusion of Trier-type ‘Moselkeramik’). Chemical analyses
by the authors and others (see also entry no. 670) have
demonstrated that the colour-coated wares made at centres such
as Lezoux, the Argonne, Jaulges/Villiers-Vineux and Trier are
clealy chemically distinguishable. Examples of vessels from all
of these sources have been identified in Normandy, as well as
vessels probably from a local source. These latter are
roughcast, cornice-rimmed beakers with a greyish fabric; all
such vessels with a reddish fabric are (chemically) identified
as from the Argonne.
Journal
of Roman Pottery Studies
Vol 3, 1990 page 116.
602 Brulet, R, Liberchies I: Vicus
Gallo-Romain, Bâtiment méridional et la Fontaine des Turcs, Fouilles
de Pierre Claes (1956-1964), Publications d’Histoire d’Art
et d’Archéologie de 1’Université Catholique de Louvain LIV,
Louvain-la-Neuve, 1987. Includes sections as follows:
Vanderhoeven, M, ‘7. La terre sigillée’, 85-103; Vilvorder,
F, Dc Wade, E & Gustin, M, ‘8a. La céramique enduite’,
103-112; Gustin, M & Vilvorder, F, ‘8b. La céramique
beige’, 112-118; Moulin, J, ‘9a. Lea cruches’, 119-123;
Vilvorder, F, ‘9b. Les amphores et les dolia’, 124-128;
Vanderhoeven, A, ‘9c. Las mortiers’, 128-136; & Moulin,
J, ‘9d. La céramique rugueuse’ & ‘La céramique
produite a la main’, 137-163.
exc/set/lst-end of 2nd/usf,typ
amp/asg/sts/cts/ats (2nd only)/kww/rhn-type/rgh/occ/mca/
tng/crb/grf/lcg/mro/buf/hft/rnf/fcp/lcl/ppr/hand-made ware/
"soapy" ware
This first volume on Liberchies is intended to be the first of a
series mirroring that on Braives. Published in the same style,
by the same team, the pottery is very similar, although the main
difference is that both of the two areas published in this
volume, a building
|
|
peripheral to the main
settlement and an area known as the ‘Fontaine des Turcs’,
were abandoned before the fourth century, the latter probably by
the beginning of the third. As there were in fact few finds from
the former area, this means that the pottery is almost entirely
1st and 2nd century. There is nevertheless much of interest in
it, in particular the groups of 2nd century Argonne samian, the
face pots, the mica-gilt ware, and the dolia. See also entry no.
652.
Journal
of Roman Pottery Studies
Vol 3, 1990 page 124.
670 Symonds, R P. ‘Le problème des
gobelets ovoïdes sablés’, Société Françoise d’Etude
de la Céramique Antique en Gaule, Actes du Congrès de Caen,
28-31 mai, 1987, 1987, 69-74. (See also entry no.
598).
exc,chm/mjc/mid-2nd/usf
clc/rgh/occ
An earlier, shorter version (in French) of a paper which appears
elsewhere in this JRPS volume, ‘The problem of
roughcast beakers, and related colour-coated wares’. The
analyses of ‘bag- shaped’ roughcast beakers found at
Colchester have shown that a small, typologically
indistinguishable proportion of these were probably not made at
Colchester, and their association with analyses of various
samian wares suggests that these may have been made at Sinzig,
on the Rhine. A further group of equally typologically
indistinguishable vessels from kiln-sites in the 67 Argonne is
also illustrated.
Location: Colchester Archaeological Trust
Journal
of Roman Pottery Studies
Vol 5, 1990 page 145
1187 Blaszkiewicz, P
& Jigan, C, 'Le problème de la diffusion et de la datation
de la céramique sigillée d'Argonne décorée à la molette des
IVème-Vème siècles dans le nord-ouest de l'Empire', SFECAG,
Actes du Congrés de Cognac, 1991, 385-414. See also entry
no. 1203.
syn/---/4th-5th/---
ats/stv (roller-stamped)
A substantial paper on the distribution of roller-stamped
Argonne samian in north-western Gaul, particularly Brittany,
Normandie and Picardie, but Britain is also included in two
general distribution maps. There is a set of eight maps of
north-western Gaul showing the comparative proportions of each
of the eight roller-stamp types defined by Hiibener (Banner
Jahrbucher, 168, 1968, 241-298; illustrations of the eight
group types, with their respective proposed dating, appear
earlier in the same SFECAG volume, in entry no. 1203,
163). There is also a set of seven maps showing the
distributions respectively of the seven most important Argonne
workshops, viz, Lavoye, Châtel-Chéhery, les Allieux,
Vauquois, Pont-des-Quatre-Enfants, Avocourt and Aubréville. A
total of 120 roller-stamped sherds or stamps on their own are
illustrated from sites in Normandie, and there are several
tables showing the numbers of examples recorded at a wide range
of sites.
The authors point out that particularly after the late 4th
century roller-stamped Argonne ware is virtually the only good
dating evidence for many sites, since dateable coins are
thereafter very rare. This means that the thirty-year periods
established by Hubener for his successive types can only be a
rough guide, and while there have been some criticisms of the
Hubener system, it remains all there is. This paper is a
considerable contribution to the subject.
|