|
Poitou-Charentes :
Journal of Roman Pottery
Studies
Vol 5, 1992 page 154
1239 Simon-Hiernard, D, 'Du nouveau
sur la céramique "à l'éponge"', SFECAG, Actes du
Congrés de Cognac, 1991, 61-76.
syn/---/end of 2nd-6th (mainly 4th)/usf
mrb
This paper follows on from Mme Simon-Hiernard's book on pottery
in the Musée de Poitiers (JRPS 4, entry no. 1005) by
re-examining and taking a broader view of the most significant
pottery type highlighted in that work, marbled wares from
western France. While retaining (and re-printing) the typology
established by Raimbault (Gallia 31, 1973, 185-206), this
study looks in detail at the distribution of Aquitanian marbled
wares, showing that they are found in highest concentration in
Charente-Maritime, to the west and north of Poitiers. Although
one outlier is noted from Switzerland, the bulk of the wares are
found to the west of Paris, from the valley of the Gironde to
the south to the Severn Valley in Britain, to the north. Simon-Hiernard's
map indicates almost as many findspots in Britain as in Normandy
and Brittany, and a remarkably high proportion of the findspots,
even those in Charente-Maritime, are either on the coast or on
rivers. One cannot usually say that an individual vessel must
have travelled by water or by land to reach its destination, and
of course most major settlements are linked to the rest of the
world by both waterways and roads, but this map does certainly
suggest a predominance of water transport for marbled wares.
There is not much doubt about the finds from Britain and the
Channel Islands.
Journal of Roman Pottery
Studies
Vol 5, 1992 page 155
1246 Vernou-Magister,
C, 'Recherches sur les lampes antiques en Poitou-Charentes', SFECAG,
Actes du Congrès de Cognac,
1991, 113-118.
syn/—/lst-4th/usf
obj (lamps)
This is a brief presentation of an inventory of lamps in the
Poitou-Charentes region, of which some 180 were catalogued. A
total of 23, representing some sixteen different types are
illustrated. Interestingly, Vernou-Magister suggests that in the
absence of any trace of burning on all but 20% of the examples,
and given that there is no evidence for any local production, it
is possible that these lamps served mainly as decorative rather
than functional objects. Lighting was perhaps more commonly
produced by "traditional" means. Such a possibility
must also apply to Roman Britain, where lamps are also
relatively scarce and seldom show signs of intensive use.
|
|
|